<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zeroing in on a new system: a postscript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachelnorton.com/2010/02/03/zeroing-in-on-a-new-system-a-postscript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachelnorton.com/2010/02/03/zeroing-in-on-a-new-system-a-postscript/</link>
	<description>A public school parent on the Board of Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rachelnorton.com/2010/02/03/zeroing-in-on-a-new-system-a-postscript/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelnorton.com/?p=2673#comment-1764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Rachel, I really appreciate your blogs.  I go straight here when I have questions. 

Question 1:  So even high demand schools like Rooftop and Clarendon, which currently are not &quot;attendance area schools&quot; would become &quot;attendance area schools&quot; under Option 2?  
Question 2:  How would immersion or bicultural programs fit under Option B?
Question 3:  When does the Board expect the attendance areas to be made public?

Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Rachel, I really appreciate your blogs.  I go straight here when I have questions. </p>
<p>Question 1:  So even high demand schools like Rooftop and Clarendon, which currently are not &#8220;attendance area schools&#8221; would become &#8220;attendance area schools&#8221; under Option 2?<br />
Question 2:  How would immersion or bicultural programs fit under Option B?<br />
Question 3:  When does the Board expect the attendance areas to be made public?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bolo</title>
		<link>http://rachelnorton.com/2010/02/03/zeroing-in-on-a-new-system-a-postscript/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bolo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelnorton.com/?p=2673#comment-1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it says the school &quot;could choose&quot; to set aside outsider spots for non-residents.  that&#039;s a pretty big &quot;if&quot; don&#039;t you think???  it seems to me after all this time, leaving out a detail like that in the plan is CRAZY!!!  am i missing something?  or, is everyone just focusing on and assuming option a is going to be it anyway, so they haven&#039;t worked through the details of option b.  the way it&#039;s written now, option b is just going to lock people out from the popular schools unless we can find housing near the schools.  i don&#039;t understand how this achieves any diversity or deals with oversubscription in the popular neighborhood, either.  so, i scramble to move near my #1 choice, as do all parents who want it, and then what happens when we can&#039;t get a spot b/c it&#039;s full?  where do we go next?  all the popular schools will be fulled b/c everyone will have moved to that area and we&#039;ll be left to the unpopular schools unless the popular schools &quot;choose&quot; to reserve spots for outsiders.  am i missing something here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it says the school &#8220;could choose&#8221; to set aside outsider spots for non-residents.  that&#8217;s a pretty big &#8220;if&#8221; don&#8217;t you think???  it seems to me after all this time, leaving out a detail like that in the plan is CRAZY!!!  am i missing something?  or, is everyone just focusing on and assuming option a is going to be it anyway, so they haven&#8217;t worked through the details of option b.  the way it&#8217;s written now, option b is just going to lock people out from the popular schools unless we can find housing near the schools.  i don&#8217;t understand how this achieves any diversity or deals with oversubscription in the popular neighborhood, either.  so, i scramble to move near my #1 choice, as do all parents who want it, and then what happens when we can&#8217;t get a spot b/c it&#8217;s full?  where do we go next?  all the popular schools will be fulled b/c everyone will have moved to that area and we&#8217;ll be left to the unpopular schools unless the popular schools &#8220;choose&#8221; to reserve spots for outsiders.  am i missing something here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2011 SFUSD Mom</title>
		<link>http://rachelnorton.com/2010/02/03/zeroing-in-on-a-new-system-a-postscript/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2011 SFUSD Mom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelnorton.com/?p=2673#comment-1742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything which increases predictability is *key*...  also, I heard that there might be momentum to change the application date.  That would reduce participation in the public schools in this town, and I believe it would actually discriminate against the people who apply to parochial and/or private schools (because of the ensuing conflict in decision dates).  You can&#039;t possibly support that as a pragmatic change...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything which increases predictability is *key*&#8230;  also, I heard that there might be momentum to change the application date.  That would reduce participation in the public schools in this town, and I believe it would actually discriminate against the people who apply to parochial and/or private schools (because of the ensuing conflict in decision dates).  You can&#8217;t possibly support that as a pragmatic change&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

