I have been neglecting the blog — I am so sorry about that. In my defense, though there is a lot happening, there hasn’t been much actually decided in the last few meetings — most of the big initiatives happening at the moment are in community engagement mode, or in the hands of the State Board, or just not quite cooked. Mainly, though, I’ve neglected blogging because I’m working full time and there is only so much I can juggle.
Anyway, let’s get a little caught up by reviewing events from last night’s meeting:
- The Quality Teacher and Education Act (QTEA) — also known as the 2008 Prop A parcel tax — Innovation and Impact cash awards for 20 schools were announced last night. To receive the $15,000 prize for Innovation or for Impact, a school serving historically underserved student populations must demonstrate an impact on student achievement or innovative strategies and practices (some schools received two awards, including Paul Revere K-8). A full list appears here. Heartfelt congratulations to these 20 school communities: you are making a difference and I am very grateful for your efforts!
- In his remarks for the evening, Superintendent Carranza noted that the Council of the Great City Schools (an advocacy group formed by the nation’s 50 largest school districts — of which SFUSD is one) is completing a study of outcomes from Federal School Improvement Grants (aka “SIG”) in their member districts. Though results aren’t yet final, SFUSD’s results are very positive compared to other districts, and our SIG work was highlighted at the organization’s most recent conference last month in Albuquerque. Superintendent Carranza also noted that the number of books in circulation in SFUSD libraries has reached 1 million — pretty impressive!
- The Board discussed the charter renewal petition for Creative Arts Charter School, a K-8 charter currently co-located with Gateway Middle School at the old Golden Gate Elementary School campus on Turk and Pierce Sts. Creative Arts (CACS) is one of the oldest charter schools in SFUSD and no Board member seriously opposed renewing the charter, though several (notably Commissioner Wynns) noted the lack of racial diversity — the school is 45 percent white and 9 percent decline to state — compared to the district as a whole (11 percent white and another 10 percent not-reported). Commissioners also pointed out that the school’s academic scores rank it as a 2 among schools with similar demographics — meaning it is underperforming based on its demographics under the state’s (very imperfect and now moot) API accountability system. Nevertheless, the Board voted unanimously to renew CACS’ charter for another five years.
- We heard a report from the Indian Education advisory committee, a Federally-mandated advisory committee that advises the Board on the education of students who are of American Indian descent. One of the bigger issues for this group of students is that there is no permanent space for the many cultural artifacts and curriculum materials the advisory committee maintains. The Superintendent pledged to make a recommendation for permanent space and to make sure that the group has access to the materials it needs to function.
- We also heard an update on the district’s implementation of Behavioral RtI (Response to Intervention, a major component of the district’s strategy to reduce the number of African American, Latino and Samoan students being referred to special education). Teachers and the principal at Lakeshore Elementary demonstrated new, positive discipline strategies they are using in the classroom, with good results. Overall, the 25 schools in the first cohort of school communities trained in Behavioral RtI have seen a 33.5% decrease in referrals to special education, compared with a 23.9% percent decrease for schools not in the first training cohort. Referrals of African American students to special education have declined 14% at schools in the training cohort, compared to a 5% reduction at schools that have not received training.
- We heard a very short update on the district’s Vision 2025 process — a large group of parents, students, educators and community leaders are meeting over the next few months to help the district envision its goals for 2025 — the next frontier for our strategic planning. It’s been exhilarating and sobering at the same time: there is so much to do and really so little time and resources to do it with; and it is so exciting and energizing to think about where we can be in the future.
- Finally, the Board voted to extend the district’s contract with the Friends of School of the Arts (FoSotA), a nonprofit that raises funds for the Ruth Asawa School of the Arts (RASotA) and has over the past few years administered the essential Artists in Residence program at the school. The Superintendent said he will move this program back under district control starting in the 2014-15 school year but needs a bit more time to put the necessary structures are in place to be sure that the transition is smooth.
There’s a lot more to dig into– the plans for the A-G graduation requirements for the class of 2014 are slated for a Board discussion on Nov. 26, and the Board must also have a discussion soon about the plans for reauthorizing the Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF, also known as Prop H), which expires at the end of the 2014-15 school year. In addition, there are community conversations going on about the possibility of combining PEEF with the reauthorization of the Children’s Amendment in some way — the Children’s Amendment is up in 2015 and currently provides upwards of $200 million in funding for all manner of children’s services from childcare to nutrition to violence prevention in San Francisco (including $5o million in annual funding for the Department of Children, Youth and their Families). Commissioner Haney is currently drafting a proposal to ban “willful defiance” suspensions, which disproportionately affect African Americans. While no one really disagrees with the proposed ban, it will require some careful analysis and discussion to be sure we really address the root causes of disproportionate suspensions of African American students.
Also, hopefully you heard that there are big changes coming to student assessment. Because of the adoption of the Common Core, students won’t take the CST this year — instead the district will pilot new computer-based assessments. There are still a number of very key questions to be answered about the implications of this change — like the effect on Lowell admissions for the 2015-16 school year and beyond, since in the past Lowell admissions for SFUSD students have used CST scores to help determine academic ranking; in addition our cohort analysis that determines which schools get what services under the multi-tiered systems of support adopted this year is based at least in part on CST scores.
More next time.
Rachel, we will be doing the high school search next year and am most concerned how admissions for Lowell is going to work now that it won’t be using standardized test results. I assume the district will not be using the results of a test that is being field tested.
Thanks Rachel for your always informative take on the Board meetings. As a CACS parent, I welcome the challenge from the Board about continuing and intensifying our attempts to recruit a more diverse racial and socio-economic set of families. But having led school tours for a number of years one of the first questions I would get asked is whether we were staying at our current location. The continued uncertainty about where we’ll be year-to-year is a huge barrier to getting Western Addition families to commit so hopefully now that our charter has been renewed the Board can come up with a longer-term solution to our facilities needs which gives both the District and CACS some stability.
In addition, since we have a blind lottery (which SFUSD oversees) we cannot restrict who applies. As the school gets better and better there is a “buzz” about it, meaning that even as we intensify our efforts to diversify our student population through targeted recruitment the overall number of white and upper class families applying continues to rise. Plus there is of course the fact that San Francisco as a whole is becoming less diverse and wealthier. These are not meant as excuses (though I’m sure some will take it that way) as much as the realities we face. I think the comment above about the demographics at other SFUSD schools like Grattan, Clarendon, etc. are worth also considering.
In any case we’re very grateful for the Board’s decision to renew the Charter and look forward to working constructively with the Board and district staff to finally resolve the facilities issue.
The commissioner’s comments about “lack of racial diversity” at Creative Arts Charter School were very hypocritical; take a look at Grattan Elementary, SOTA, and many other schools that are disproportionally “white” and have low (20%) “free and reduced lunch” numbers. Look at Clarendon’s 15% free and reduced lunch/ overly “white” student population. Much political posturing at that meeting!
Well, API is based on CST. CST is now moot, ergo API is moot.
Can you explain the ‘now moot’ comment about API?