Recap: Feb. 22, 2016 — CAT, doors and teachers

Key events from last night’s meeting:

  • Renewing the charter for City Arts and Tech (CAT) charter HS; there are some real concerns about the school’s high suspension rate (16% in recent years) but most of us feel the school is doing enough good things for students to renew the charter. The school has pledged to cut the suspension rate in half by next year so we will be watching that closely.
  • Public comment: parents and community members came again to remind us that the situation at Carver Elementary is untenable. The school was designed in the 1960s as an open pod, all the rage at the time, but times have changed. Parents and teachers feel strongly that the noise and open design of the school presents problems both for student learning and student security, and they are demanding the school be remodeled to address these issues. I think every Board member agrees that the school design is not workable, and the Superintendent announced that funds from previous bonds are available to address Carver facility issues — possibly as much as $1 million.
  • The Board passed the Public Education Enrichment Fund (PEEF) spending plan, which included new spending of more than $800,000 since the last time we discussed the plan at the Feb. 15 Committee of the Whole. New money is good, and I am in broad agreement with the Superintendent’s plan to divide the additional revenues between the SLAM (Sports, Libraries, Arts and Music) portion and the “third-third” (other general revenues) portion — directed to Peer Resources and the SOAR program that serves and supports students with serious behavioral issues. Still, as the chair of the Budget Committee,  I had to raise the issue that a significant chunk of new money dropped into the budget between the first reading and the Board vote, and I am a little uncomfortable that the Board had no discussion on how to spend those funds before second reading.
  • The Board voted unanimously to support Supervisor Campos’ legislation that would expand tenant protections to prevent teachers and other school employees, as well as families with school-age children, from being evicted during the school year for most reasons other than nonpayment of rent.
Advertisements

2 responses to “Recap: Feb. 22, 2016 — CAT, doors and teachers

  1. Charters have different reporting requirements around discipline than traditional public schools, so yeah, we’re concerned about it. Agreed that cutting the rate doesn’t necessarily mean the school is more welcoming, but it’s a start. I don’t think we’re concerned about the suspension data to the exclusion of other, less tangible measures of school climate. After all, we did approve the charter.

  2. Is the board only concerned with cutting the suspension rate or with extensive information and data about programs and services geared toward improved conduct or improved student-teacher understanding? Actually, CAT is one of the high schools that probably achieves higher compatibility rates in terms of teacher-student relationships.

    Anyway, cutting the rate doesn’t necessarily mean that there is an improved sense of culture, community, and prosocial belonging at school. I hope that you are not focusing on a superficial statistic at the risk of neglecting something more meaningful and informative.